网刊加载中。。。

使用Chrome浏览器效果最佳,继续浏览,你可能不会看到最佳的展示效果,

确定继续浏览么?

复制成功,请在其他浏览器进行阅读

The influence of V/III ratio on electron mobility of the InAsxSb1-x layers grown on GaAs substrate by molecular beam epitaxy  PDF

  • ZHANG Jing 1
  • YANG Zhi 1
  • ZHENG Li-Ming 2
  • ZHU Xiao-Juan 1
  • WANG Ping 1
  • YANG Lin 3
1. School of Electronic Information and Artificial Intelligence, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710016, China; 2. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xi’an Traffic Engineering Institute, Xi’an 710300, China; 3. School of Information Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China

CLC: TN304.2TN305

Updated:2025-02-27

DOI:10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2025.01.004

  • Full Text
  • Figs & Tabs
  • References
  • Authors
  • About
CN CITE
OUTLINE

Abstract

This paper discusses the influence of Sb/In ratio on the transport properties and crystal quality of the 200 nm InAsxSb1-x thin film. The Sb content of InAsxSb1-x thin film in all samples was verified by HRXRD of the symmetrical 004 reflections and asymmetrical 115 reflections. The calculation results show that the Sb component was 0.6 in the InAsxSb1-x thin film grown under the conditions of Sb/In ratio of 6 and As/In ratio of 3, which has the highest electron mobility (28 560 cm2/V·s) at 300 K. At the same time, the influence of V/III ratio on the transport properties and crystal quality of Al0.2In0.8Sb/InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures also has been investigated. As a result, the Al0.2In0.8Sb/InAs0.4Sb0.6 quantum well heterostructure with a channel thickness of 30 nm grown under the conditions of Sb/In ratio of 6 and As/In ratio of 3 has a maximum electron mobility of 28 300 cm2/V·s and a minimum RMS roughness of 0.68 nm. Through optimizing the growth conditions, our samples have higher electron mobility and smoother surface morphology.

Introduction

High-speed devices using III-V compound materials have become one of the international research hotspots

12. The narrow band-gap materials of InAs, InSb and InAsSb in III-V compounds not only have high electron mobility and electron saturation drift velocity, but also can form diverse quantum well band structures with AlSb, GaSb and other related ternary broadband gap materials3-7. These excellent characteristics allow the electrical devices to have the advantages of ultra-high speed and low power consumption. There has been some literature 8-10 on using InAs materials as channel layers to prepare high electron mobility transistor (HEMT). To pursue higher working speed and lower power consumption, the highest electron mobility in all III-V binary compounds of InSb has generated considerable interest for the fabrication of HEMT1112. However, the growth of high-quality InSb is challenging due to the large lattice mismatch between InSb and GaAs substrates. To minimize the problem of lattice strain and improve mobility, InAsSb ternary alloy is anticipated to substitute of InSb and InAs. Meanwhile, the straddle energy band structure of Al0.2In0.8Sb/InAs0.4Sb0.6 heterostructure is used to replace the interleaved energy band structure of InAs/AlSb heterostructure, which can effectively reduce the lattice mismatch and the gate leakage current caused by holes. Therefore, InAsSb material is expected to become a strong competitor as a channel material in the next generation of HEMT1314.

Since the InAsSb material contains two V elements of As and Sb, the composition of group V elements cannot be accurately calculated by the ratio of growth rates. More influencing factors need to be considered when growing InAsSb materials because the adhesion of As and Sb elements varies under different growth conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to study the composition control of InAsSb materials grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Based on the theoretical calculation results reported in the current literature

15-17, the electron mobility of InAsSb as a channel material can reach more than 30 000 cm2/V·s. However, the current experimental results are far lower than the simulation results due to challenges in the growth process such as interface mismatch and dislocation scattering18-20. In comparison, fewer reports on experimental results on the transport characteristics of the InAsxSb1-x with different Sb content are available currently.

This paper discusses the influence of Sb/In ratio on the transport properties and crystal quality of the 200 nm InAsxSb1-x thin film. The Sb content of InAsxSb1-x thin film in all samples was verified by HRXRD via the symmetrical 004 reflections and asymmetrical 115 reflections. In addition, the influence of Sb/In ratio and As/In ratio on the transport properties and crystal quality of Al0.2In0.8Sb/ InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures has also been investigated. By optimizing the Sb/In ratio and As/In ratio, Al0.2In0.8Sb/ InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures with good surface morphology and high electron mobility were obtained. All samples were confirmed by atomic force microscopy (AFM), high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD), reciprocal space map (RSM) and Hall measurement.

1 Experimental procedures

All samples were grown on GaAs substrate by Gen-II solid-source MBE system. After deoxidation of GaAs substrate at 690 ℃ for 5 minutes, a 100 nm GaAs was grown at 650 ℃ and a 100 nm GaSb was grown at 540 ℃ to ensure that the substrate surface was flat. For one structure, a 1.5 μm Al0.2In0.8Sb metamorphic buffer layer was used to study the transport properties of the 200 nm InAsxSb1-x layer, as shown in Fig. 1. The 200 nm InAsxSb1-x thin films of the first group of samples A1, A2 and A3 were grown at different the Sb/In ratios of 5, 6 and 7, while the As/In ratio is kept at about 3.

Fig.1  Schematic diagram of InAsxSb1-x thin film structure

图1  InAsxSb1-x薄膜结构示意图

For another structure, the Al0.2In0.8Sb/ InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures were grown for preparing high electron mobility transistors, as shown in Fig.2. For the Al0.2In0.8Sb/ InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures, the 1.5 μm Al0.2In0.8Sb that acted as a lower barrier layer and buffer was directly deposited on the GaSb buffer layer. Then a different thicknesses InAsxSb1-x channel, a 20 nm Al0.2In0.8Sb upper barrier layer and a 5 nm InSb cap layer were deposited on the top of the Al0.2In0.8Sb layer.

Fig.2  Schematic diagram of Al0.2In0.8Sb/ InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures

图2  Al0.2In0.8Sb/ InAsxSb1-x量子阱异质结构示意图

The first group of samples B1, B2, and B3 with different Sb/In ratios (5,6,7) were grown to investigate the effects of different Sb components on the crystal quality and electron mobility of Al0.2In0.8Sb/ InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures, while the As/In ratio was also kept at about 3. Meanwhile, the channel thickness of this group of samples was 15 nm.The second group of samples C1, C2, and C3 with different As/In ratios (1,2,3) were grown to investigate the effects of different As components on the crystal quality and electron mobility of Al0.2In0.8Sb/InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures, while the Sb/In ratio was kept at about 6. Meanwhile, the channel thickness of this group of samples was increased from 15 nm to 30 nm. The third group of samples D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5 corresponds to InAs0.4Sb0.6 channel layer thicknesses of 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 nm to investigate the effect of different channel thicknesses on the crystal quality and electron mobility of Al0.2In0.8Sb/ InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures. The Sb/In ratio was kept at about 6 and the As/In ratio was kept at about 3.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 The influences of Sb/In ratios on InAsxSb1-x thin films

Figure 3 displays 2×2 μm2 AFM images of samples A1, A2 and A3 with an RMS roughness of 0.287 nm, 0.28 nm and 0.6 nm, respectively. Atomic steps can be clearly seen in samples A2 and A3, indicating that the surfaces of the samples are very flat. However, some bright spots can be seen in sample A3. These were due to the excess Sb beam while the Sb/In ratio was 7, resulting in residual Sb elements on the surface. The 10×10 μm2 AFM images of samples A1, A2 and A3 can also be found that sample A2 has the smallest RMS value of 0.7 nm, which is much smaller than a recent literature report(1.9 nm

21.

(a)  

(b)  

Fig.3 (a) 2×2 μm2 AFM image of samples A1, A2, A3; (b) 10×10 μm2 AFM image of samples A1, A2, A3

图3 (a)样品A1、A2、A3的2×2 μm2 AFM扫描图像;(b)样品A1、A2、A3的10×10 μm2 AFM扫描图像

The Sb content of the InAsxSb1-x layer in all samples was verified by HRXRD via the symmetrical 004 reflections and asymmetrical 115 reflections, as shown in Fig. 4(a) and 4(b). The calculation results are shown in Table 1. The Sb composition of sample A1 was calculated to be 0.68 and the lattice constant of InAs0.32Sb0.68 was found to be 6.3464 Å. The Sb composition of sample A2 was 0.6 and the lattice constant of InAs0.4Sb0.6 was 6.3068 Å. The Sb composition of sample A3 was 0.84 and the lattice constant of InAs16Sb0.84 was 6.4099 Å. The diffraction peaks of GaAs, GaSb, InAsxSb1-x and Al0.2In0.8Sb can be clearly observed for samples A1 and A2. In sample A3, only the diffraction peaks of GaAs, GaSb and Al0.2In0.8Sb can be observed. This is because the InAs16Sb0.84 lattice constant of sample A3 is close to the lattice constant of Al0.2In0.8Sb (6.4106 Å), causing their diffraction peaks to overlap.

Table 1  Results calculated from HRXRD measurements
表1  HRXRD测量计算结果
Sample(004)scanning(115)scanninga(Å)1-X
Bragg anglea⊥(Å)Bragg anglea//(Å)
A1 29.06° 6.3435 39.08° 6.3491 6.3464 0.68
A2 29.08° 6.3395 39.62° 6.2765 6.3068 0.6
A3 28.73° 6.41 38.64° 6.4099 6.4099 0.84

The crystalline quality of the epitaxial layers was further assessed by XRD RSM measurements. Figure 5 (a), (b) and (c) show the logarithmic XRD RSM for the symmetrical (004) for sample A1, sample A2 and sample A3, respectively. Apart from the GaAs substrate peak denoted by S, three epitaxial peaks were also identified from Fig.5 (a), (b) and (c) denoted by L1, L2 and L3, respectively. L1 represents the epitaxial peak of GaSb, L2 represents the epitaxial peak of InAsxSb1-x and L3 represents the epitaxial peak of Al0.2In0.8Sb. Corresponding to the analysis in Fig.4, it can be seen that the epitaxial peak of InAs0.16Sb0.84 in sample A3 is indeed close to the epitaxial peak of Al0.2In0.8Sb.

(a)  

(b)  

Fig. 4 HRXRD scanning curves of (a) (004) peak and (b) (115) peak for various samples.

图4 样品的HRXRD:(a)(004)扫描和(b)(115)扫描

Fig.5  XRD RSMs of the symmetrical (004) (a) sample A1; (b) sample A2 and (c) sample A3

图5  对称扫描(004)(a)样品A1;(b)样品A2和(c)样品A3的XRD-RSM

The influence of the V/III ratio on the electrical properties of InAsxSb1-x thin films was examined by determining the Hall properties. The electron mobility μ refers to the average speed of electron units under the electric field intensity. The value of μ can be obtained from the following formula:

μ=q<τ>/m* , (1)

where m* represents the electron effective massive, τ represents the mean free time of electrons and q represents electron charge. InAsxSb1-x is a compound of InSb and InAs materials, so its crystal structure is relatively stable. The room temperature electron effective mass of InAsxSb1-x is 0.023-0.039(1-x)+0.03(1-x2 m0. Therefore, InAsSb with a 60% Sb component has the lowest electron effective mass among III-V compound semiconductors, resulting in the highest electron mobility

2223. As shown in Fig.6, Hall measurements were performed on 1 cm × 1 cm sample pieces at 300 K to obtain the electron mobility, results of 24 540 cm2/V·s were obtained for sample A1, 28 560 cm2/V·s for sample A2 and 25 850 cm2/V·s for sample A3. It can be seen from the above results that the highest mobility is indeed obtained when the Sb component is 0.6. The results of electron mobility in this paper are much better than previously reported, as shown in Table 2. For comparison with the literature, the density of 2DEG concentration was converted into a volume density value of 1.01 ×1018 cm-3.

Fig.6  Electron mobility μ and 2DEG concentrations ns versus different Sb/In ratios for samples A1, A2, A3

图6  样品A1,A2和A3的电子迁移率和二维电子气浓度与不同的Sb/In比

Table 2  Summary of literature data about the structural properties of InAsxSb1-x thin films.
表2  InAsxSb1-x薄膜结构特性的文献数据汇总
RefSb composition

Thickness

(nm)

RMS roughness

(nm)

Electron mobility

(cm2/V·s)

2DEG concentrations

(cm-3

21 0.58 1 500 1.9(10×10 μm2 - -
24 0.13 5 000 - 25 000 5 × 1016
25 0.05 800 3.954(2×2 μm2 5 430 1.01×1017
26 0.9 1 000 1.99(10×10 μm2 13 000 1.3×1017
This work 0.6 200 0.7(10×10 μm2 28 560 1.01 ×1018

2.2 The influences of Sb/In ratios on Al0.2In0.8Sb/InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures

Although InAsSb has excellent transmission properties, the lack of matching high-quality semi-insulating substrates limits its development. Therefore, an Al0.2In0.8Sb strain buffer layer was used to release the stress caused by the lattice mismatch between InAsSb and GaAs substrates. The AFM images of Al0.2In0.8Sb/InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures grown under different Sb/In ratios are shown in Fig.7. It showed a 10×10 μm2 AFM images of sample B1, B2 and B3 with an RMS roughness of 2.794 nm, 1.725 nm and 3.359 nm, respectively. It can be seen that when the Sb/In ratio was 6, the surface of the sample was the smoothest and with its RMS roughness at the lowest of the batch of samples.

Fig.7  10×10 μm2 AFM image of samples B1, B2, B3

图7  样品B1, B2, B3的10×10 μm2 AFM扫描图像

The (004) HRXRD scanning curves of samples with different Sb components are shown in Fig.8. The diffraction intensity of the InAsxSb1-x channel layer is very weak because its thickness is too thin. From Fig.8, it can be observed that the Bragg angles of Al0.2In0.8Sb in all samples are the same, indicating that the Al composition is the same. Additionally, it was assumed that the contribution of FWHM mainly comes from lattice distortion caused by dislocations, and the dislocation density in Al0.2In0.8Sb thin film samples can be calculated based on FWHM. The FWHM of the Al0.2In0.8Sb buffer layer in samples B1, B2, and B3 are 1 109 arcsec, 997 arcsec, and 1 033 arcsec, respectively, indicating that the quality of the three samples is equivalent.

Fig.8  HRXRD scanning curves of (004) peak for samples B1, B2, B3

图8  样品B1、B2、B3的(004)峰HRXRD扫描曲线

As shown in Fig.9, the electron mobilities of samples B1, B2 and B3 at 300 K are 17 500 cm2/V·s, 18 500 cm2/V·s and 17 700 cm2/V·s, respectively. According to the calculation results in Table 1, the channel materials of samples B1, B2, and B3 are InAs0.32Sb0.68, InAs0.4Sb0.6 and InAs0.16Sb0.84, respectively. Figure 9 shows that the Al0.2In0.8Sb/ InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures obtain the maximum electron mobility when the Sb component is 0.6. This result is consistent with the Hall test results in Table 1. This is because the effective mass of electrons reaches a minimum value when the Sb component is 60%. The 2DEG concentrations in the channel are 9.44×1011 cm-2, 1×1012 cm-2 and 7.89×1011 cm-2 respectively, with little change.

Fig.9  Electron mobility μ and 2DEG concentrations ns versus different Sb/In ratios

图9  电子迁移率μ和2DEG浓度ns与不同Sb/In比的关系

2.3 The influences of As/In ratio on Al0.2In0.8Sb/InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures

It can be observed from the comparison between Fig.6 and Fig.9 that the electron mobility of sample A2 in InAsxSb1-x with 15 nm thickness was significantly lower. Therefore, three samples with different As/In ratios were grown for study after changing the channel thickness in the quantum well from 15 nm to 30 nm. Figure 10 displays the images of a 10 μm×10 μm surface scan of samples C1, C2 and C3 with an RMS roughness of 1.757 nm, 1.785 nm and 0.68 nm, respectively. It shows that sample C3 has a smoother surface than other samples.

Fig.10  10×10 μm2 AFM image of samples C1, C2, C3

图10  样品C1、C2、C3的10×10 μm2 AFM图像

The (004) HRXRD scanning curves of samples with different As components are shown in Fig.11. In Fig.11, there are only three peaks corresponding to the GaAs substrate, GaSb buffer layer, and Al0.2In0.8Sb strain buffer layer. Because the thickness of the channel layer InAsxSb1-x was too thin to be observed. The peaks of the Al0.2In0.8Sb strain buffer layer in all samples are clearly visible. The FWHM of samples C1, C2 and C3 are 903 arcsec, 936 arcsec, and 986 arcsec, respectively. The similar FWHM and Bragg peak positions indicate that the crystalline quality of all samples is similar.

Fig.11  HRXRD scanning curves of (004) peak for samples C1, C2, C3

图11  样品C1、C2、C3的(004)峰HRXRD扫描曲线

Electron mobility is an important electrical parameter that can be used to evaluate whether Al0.2In0.8Sb/InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures grown by MBE can be used to prepare high mobility transistors. As shown in Fig.12, the electron mobility of samples C1, C2, and C3 at 300 K is 10 100 cm2/V·s, 22 020 cm2/V·s and 28 300 cm2/V·s, respectively. Because In atoms will occupy a portion of As and Sb atomic positions as well as interstitial positions in the lattice at the lower V/III flux ratio, this can easily cause In atom clusters. This situation will cause a decrease in the electron mobility as seen for samples C1 and C2.

Fig.12  Electron mobility μ and 2DEG concentrations ns versus different As/In ratios

图12  电子迁移率μ和2DEG浓度ns 与不同As/In比的关系

2.4 The influences of channel thickness on Al0.2In0.8Sb/InAs0.4Sb0.6 quantum well heterostructures

Based on the previous optimization results, it was found that the thickness of the InAsxSb1-x layer has a significant impact on electron mobility. Therefore, the influence of channel thickness on electron mobility and 2DEG concentration was studied while fixing the Sb/In ratio at 6 and As/In ratio at 3. Figure 13 shows the electron mobility and 2DEG concentration dependence on channel thickness at 300 K. It is evident that the electron mobility of samples increases quickly from 18 500 cm2/Vs to 28 300 cm2/Vs with the increase of the channel width from 15 nm to 30 nm. When the InAs0.4Sb0.6 channel width is 30 nm, the mobility reaches the maximum of 28 300 cm2/Vs. When the channel width is larger than 30 nm, the electron mobility decreases slowly from 28 300 cm2/Vs to 27 400 cm2/Vs. Interface roughness scattering is the main factor limiting the mobility in InAs0.4Sb0.6 channels thinner than 30 nm, while dislocation scattering is the main factor limiting the mobility in InAs0.4Sb0.6 channels above 30 nm. Therefore, the electron mobility is no longer increasing with channel layer thickness after 30 nm. After our literature search, the highest electron mobility reported for the InAsSb quantum well heterostructures is currently 28 000 cm2/Vs

27. They used a digital alloy method to grow InAs0.125Sb0.875 material as the channel layer. However, this method of growing InAs0.125Sb0.875 channel layers using digital alloys introduces more interfaces. Moreover, interface roughness scattering will have a significant impact on electron mobility. Therefore, the results obtained by the growth method used in this article have obvious advantages. From Fig.13, it can be seen that the 2DEG in the quantum well is 6.03×1011 ―1.01×1012 cm-2. The overall trend change is not significant.

Fig.13  Electron mobility μ and 2DEG concentration ns versus different channel thickness

图13  电子迁移率μ和2DEG浓度ns与不同沟道厚度的关系

3 Conclusion

In summary, the influence of the V/III ratio on the transport properties and crystal quality of the 200 nm InAsxSb1-x thin film and Al0.2In0.8Sb/InAsxSb1-x quantum well heterostructures has been investigated. The calculation results indicated that the Sb component is 0.6 in the InAsxSb1-x thin film when grown under the conditions of Sb/in ratio of 6 and As/in ratio of 3. Meanwhile, the highest electron mobility of InAsxSb1-x thin film measured at room temperature was 28 560 cm2/V·s. In addition, the highest electron mobility of the Al0.2In0.8Sb/InAs0.4Sb0.6 quantum well heterostructures was obtained at 28 300 cm2/V·s for a sample with a channel thickness of 30 nm grown under the conditions where Sb/in ratio was 6 and As/in ratio was 3. This investigation reports the high-quality film and high electron mobility obtained for Al0.2In0.8Sb/InAs0.4Sb0.6 heterostructures lattice-matched to GaAs and opens the exploration of their uses in high electron mobility transistors.

References

1

Shandilya SMadhu CKumar V. Performance Analysis of the Gate All Around Nanowire FET with Group III-V Compound Channel Materials and High-k Gate Oxides[J].Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Materials2023243):228-234. 10.1007/s42341-023-00438-8 [Baidu Scholar] 

2

Hoshi TKashio NShiratori Yet al.InGaP/GaAsSb/InGaAsSb double heterojunction bipolar transistors with 703-GHz fmax and 5.4-V breakdown voltage[J].IEICE Electronics Express2019. 10.1587/elex.16.20181125 [Baidu Scholar] 

3

Le S PSuzuki T K.Electron mobility anisotropy in InAs/GaAs(001) heterostructures [J].Applied Physics Letters202111818):182101. 10.1063/5.0039748 [Baidu Scholar] 

4

Komatsu SIrie HAkiho Tet al.Gate tuning of fractional quantum Hall states in an InAs two-dimensional electron gas[J].Physical Review B2021. 10.1103/physrevb.105.075305 [Baidu Scholar] 

5

Menon HMorgan N PHetherington Cet al.Fabrication of Single‐Crystalline InSb‐on‐Insulator by Rapid Melt Growth[J].Physica status solidi, A. Applications and materials science ePSS, 20224):219. 10.1002/pssa.202100467 [Baidu Scholar] 

6

Lei ZCheah ERubi Ket al.High-quality Two-Dimensional Electron Gas in Undoped InSb Quantum Wells[J]. 2021. 10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013039 [Baidu Scholar] 

7

Svensson S PBeck W ASarney W Let al.Temperature dependent Hall effect in InAsSb with a 0.11 eV 77 K-bandgap[J].Applied Physics Letters201911412):122102. 10.1063/1.5081120 [Baidu Scholar] 

8

Wei QWang HZhao Xet al.Electron mobility anisotropy in (Al,Ga)Sb/InAs two-dimensional electron gases epitaxied on GaAs (001) substrates[J].Journal of Semiconductors 43.72022):6. 10.1088/1674-4926/43/7/072101 [Baidu Scholar] 

9

Chen YLin HLee Ket al.Inverted-Type InAlAs/InAs High-Electron-Mobility Transistor with Liquid Phase Oxidized InAlAs as Gate Insulator.[J].Materials (Basel, Switzerland)2021144):970. 10.3390/ma14040970 [Baidu Scholar] 

10

Sukhanov M ABakarov A KZhuravlev K S. AlSb/InAs Heterostructures for Microwave Transistors[J].Technical Physics Letters: Letters to the Russian Journal of Applied Physics2021472):139-142. 10.1134/s1063785021020127 [Baidu Scholar] 

11

Bergeron E ASfigakis FShi Yet al.Field effect two-dimensional electron gases in modulation-doped InSb surface quantum wells[J].Applied Physics Letters20231221):012103. 10.1063/5.0126704 [Baidu Scholar] 

12

Kumar V AAnandan P .Analysis & Simulation of InSb HEMT Device for Low Power and Switching Applications[J]. 2015779-81. [Baidu Scholar] 

13

Boland J LAmaduzzi FSterzl Set al.High Electron Mobility and Insights into Temperature-Dependent Scattering Mechanisms in InAsSb Nanowires.[J].Nano Letters2018186):37033710. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00842 [Baidu Scholar] 

14

Kruppa WBoos J BBennett B Ret al.Low-frequency noise characteristics of AlSb/InAsSb HEMTs[J].Solid State Electronics20044810/11):2079-2084. 10.1016/j.sse.2004.05.069 [Baidu Scholar] 

15

Zhang YZhang YGuan Met al.Theoretical study of transport property in InAsSb quantum well heterostructures[J].Journal of Applied Physics201311415):111108-1. 10.1063/1.4826071 [Baidu Scholar] 

16

Devakadaksham GKumar MSarkar C K .Threading dislocation degradation of InSb to InAsSb subchannel double heterostructures[J]. Electronic Materials Letters2015114):1-6. 10.1007/s13391-015-4330-8 [Baidu Scholar] 

17

Zhang YZhang YWang Cet al.Transport properties in AlInSb/InAsSb heterostructures[J].Journal of Applied Physics201311424):243710. 10.1063/1.4858399 [Baidu Scholar] 

18

Egan R JChin V W LTansley T L .Dislocation scattering effects on electron mobility in InAsSb[J].Journal of Applied Physics1994755):2473-2476. 10.1063/1.356244 [Baidu Scholar] 

19

Mahadik NSvensson S .Dislocation analysis of epitaxial InAsSb on a metamorphic graded layer using x-ray topography[J].Journal of Applied Physics202213118),184501. 10.1063/5.0091954 [Baidu Scholar] 

20

Taghipour ZLiu A W KFastenau J Met al.Investigation of bulk and surface minority carrier lifetimes in metamorphic InAsSb grown on GaAs and Si[J].Journal of Applied Physics20211291):015106. 10.1063/5.0022317 [Baidu Scholar] 

21

Woo SYeon EChu R Jet al.Metamorphic growth of 0.1 eV InAsSb on InAs/GaAs virtual substrate for LWIR applications[J].Applied Surface Science: A Journal Devoted to the Properties of Interfaces in Relation to the Synthesis and Behaviour of Materials, 2023(Jun.30:623156899. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.156899 [Baidu Scholar] 

22

Manyk TRutkowski JKopytko Met al.Determination of the Strain Influence on the InAs/InAsSb Type-II Superlattice Effective Masses[J].Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)20222221),8243. 10.3390/s22218243 [Baidu Scholar] 

23

El Khalidi ZGrein C HCiani Aet al.Assessing Sb Cross Incorporation in InAs/InAsSb Superlattices[J].Journal of Electronic Materials20225112):6784-6791. 10.1007/s11664-022-09952-6 [Baidu Scholar] 

24

Benyahia DKubiszyn LMichalczewski Ket al.Investigation on the InAs1-xSbx epilayers growth on GaAs (001) substrate by molecular beam epitaxy[J].Journal of Semiconductors20183903):18-22. 10.1088/1674-4926/39/3/033003 [Baidu Scholar] 

25

Ni P NTong J CTobing L Y Met al.A buffer-free method for growth of InAsSb films on GaAs (001) substrates using MOCVD[J].Journal of Crystal Growth2016S0022024816308442. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.11.124 [Baidu Scholar] 

26

Gao HWang WJiang Zet al.The growth parameter influence on the crystal quality of InAsSb grown on GaAs by molecular beam epitaxy[J].Journal of Crystal Growth20073082):406-411. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.08.018 [Baidu Scholar] 

27

Kudo MMishima TTanaka T .Increased electron mobility of InAsSb channel heterostructures grown on GaAs substrates by molecular beam epitaxy[J].Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology. B, 2000182):746-750. 10.1116/1.591270 [Baidu Scholar]